Home/New York Court of Appeals/Cahill v. Haff

Cahill v. Haff

164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 509, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cahill v. Haff. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 N.Y. 377 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 1928·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur so as to authorize application forthwith to a Special Term of the Supreme Court for the entry of an interlocutory decree in accordance with the terms of the remittitur, granted. (See 248 N. Y. 377.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cahill v. Haff, 164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 509, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 833 (N.Y. 1928).

164 N.E. 564 (Cahill v. Haff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cahill v. Haff
162 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)