Cahill v. Haff

166 N.E. 314, 250 N.Y. 536, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1030

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cahill v. Haff. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 N.Y. 377 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1928·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 248 N. Y. 377; 249 N. Y. 509, 528.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cahill v. Haff, 166 N.E. 314, 250 N.Y. 536, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1030 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

166 N.E. 314 (Cahill v. Haff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

162 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)