Cafferty v. . Southern Tier Publishing Company
123 N.E. 258, 226 N.Y. 622, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 983
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 226 N. Y. 87.)
Motion granted and remittitur amended so as to read as follows: “ Judgments reversed and judgment ordered overruling defendant’s demurrer, with costs.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cafferty v. . Southern Tier Publishing Company, 123 N.E. 258, 226 N.Y. 622, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 983 (N.Y. 1919).
123 N.E. 258 (Cafferty v. . Southern Tier Publishing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G. E. Moore Co. v. Walker
102 S.E.2d 106 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Nowlin v. Mississippi Chemical Co.
70 So. 2d 49 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Follett v. Voris
205 F.2d 542 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Follett v. Voris
104 F. Supp. 827 (S.D. Texas, 1952)
State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.
67 N.E.2d 536 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
State ex rel. Bohan v. Industrial Commission
146 Ohio St. (N.S.) 618 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
Richardson v. Maryland Casualty Co.
153 S.E. 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Broderick v. Industrial Commission
224 P. 876 (Utah Supreme Court, 1924)