Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. State Department of Liquor Control

138 N.E.2d 315, 73 Ohio Law. Abs. 492, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 872
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 1956·No. No. 5433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion of the appellee seeking an order dismissing the appeal for the reason that no bill of exceptions has been signed, allowed and filed in accordance with §2321.06 et seq, R. C. The record discloses that the decision of the trial court is entered on the record which exemplifies some of the errors set forth in the appellant’s assignment of errors. Under §2321.05 R. C., a bill of exceptions is not required under such circumstances. See In re Estate of Anderson, 71 Abs 126; Hoffman Candy Co. v. Dept of Liquor Control, 56 Abs 257; Harlem v. Board of Liquor Control, 62 Abs 355.

The motion is overruled. The appellant’s motion for leave to present oral argument is also overruled.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK, J, concur. WISEMAN, J, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. State Department of Liquor Control, 138 N.E.2d 315, 73 Ohio Law. Abs. 492, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 872 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956).

138 N.E.2d 315 (Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. State Department of Liquor Control) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betty's Royal Tavern, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control
144 N.E.2d 235 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1956)