Betty's Royal Tavern, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control

144 N.E.2d 235, 75 Ohio Law. Abs. 457, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 859
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1956·No. No. 5435·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion of the appellee permit holder seeking an order dismissing the appeal for the reason that the appellant Board of Liquor Control has failed to file a bill of exceptions within the time required by [458]*458§2321.05 R. C. The record discloses that the notice of appeal on questions of law was filed on December 21, 1955, and that no bill has -been filed up to the time of the filing of this motion, to wit, April 19, 1956. We have examined the assignment of errors submitted, together with appellant’s brief, and are of the opinion that a bill of exceptions is not necessary to exemplify some of the alleged errors to which the appeal is directed. The decision of the Court is also entered on the record which eliminates the necessity of a bill. Sec. 2321.05 R. C. requires a bill of exceptions only under certain conditions and “when the decision is not entered on the record.” This Court has frequently held that a bill of exceptions is not always essential to a review. See Cafe Tia Juana v. Board of Liquor Control, No. 5433, decided on April 18, 1956 (73 Abs 492), and cases cited therein.

The motion will be overruled.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK, J, concur. WISEMAN, J, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Betty's Royal Tavern, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control, 144 N.E.2d 235, 75 Ohio Law. Abs. 457, 1956 Ohio App. LEXIS 859 (Ohio Ct. App. 1956).

144 N.E.2d 235 (Betty's Royal Tavern, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Ridge v. Moon
200 N.E.2d 794 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963)
Mellman v. Golden
190 N.E.2d 693 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1962)