Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED November 14, 2008 No. 07-10711 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk CADLES OF GRASSY MEADOWS II, L.L.C., by Assignment from Olney Savings Association,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAVID GOLDNER; ROBERT GOLDNER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion, 542 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. Sept. 8, 2008), is WITHDRAWN. This matter is REMANDED for fur- ther proceedings in light of Kerlin v. Sauceda, 2008 Tex. LEXIS 943 (Tex. Oct. 10, 2008). We place no limits on what actions the district court may take on re- mand. We intimate no view as to what decisions the district court should make regarding Kerlin or any other issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner (Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.