Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 14, 2008
No. 07-10711
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
CADLES OF GRASSY MEADOWS II, L.L.C., by Assignment from Olney Savings Association,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAVID GOLDNER; ROBERT GOLDNER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion, 542 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. Sept. 8, 2008), is WITHDRAWN. This matter is REMANDED for further proceedings in light of Kerlin v. Sauceda, 2008 Tex. LEXIS 943 (Tex. Oct. 10, 2008). We place no limits on what actions the district court may take on remand . We intimate no view as to what decisions the district court should make regarding Kerlin or any other issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner (Cadles Grassy Meadow v. Goldner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.