C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann
155 N.Y.S. 1098, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D. 945 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. We think that on the evidence of the defendant Amelia Baumann, and in the light of the proofs adduced by the plaintiff, the trial court was justified in finding that the use of the name "Baumann," without any other designation, by the defendants, was not in gocd faith. See, also, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1098.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann, 155 N.Y.S. 1098, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
155 N.Y.S. 1098 (C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.