C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann

170 A.D. 950
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D. 945

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We think that on the evidence of the defendant Amelia Baumann, and in the light of the proofs adduced by the plaintiff, the trial court was justified in finding that theuse of the name “ Baumann,” without any other designation, by the defendants, was not in good faith. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann, 170 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

170 A.D. 950 (C. Ludwig Baumann & Co. v. Baumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.