C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 F. Supp. 874 →
United States Customs Court·Decided August 23, 1956·No. No. 60181; protests 222702-K, etc. (Buffalo)·Published
Opinions
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sulphur ore the same in all material respects as that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 55, C. D. 1678), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 319 (cusc 1956).
37 Cust. Ct. 319 (C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Kansas City Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States
1 Ct. Cust. 472 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1911)
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 507 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
Tower v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 55 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)
United States v. Brewster
167 F. 122 (Fifth Circuit, 1909)