United States v. Brewster

167 F. 122, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1909·No. No. 1,811 (1,961)·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under the facts in this case it is not necessary to decide whether the provision for lead-bearing ores in paragraph 181, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule C, 30 Stat. 166 (U. S. Comp. St.' 1901, p. 1644), is exclusive. On the merits the Board of General Appraisers and the Circuit Court ruled correctly.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brewster, 167 F. 122, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333 (5th Cir. 1909).

167 F. 122 (United States v. Brewster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 64 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 319 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)
Tower v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 55 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)
National Zinc Co. v. United States
7 Ct. Cust. 145 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1916)