United States v. Brewster
167 F. 122, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1909
DocketNo. 1,811 (1,961)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 167 F. 122 (United States v. Brewster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Brewster, 167 F. 122, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333 (5th Cir. 1909).
Opinion
Under the facts in this case it is not necessary to decide whether the provision for lead-bearing ores in paragraph 181, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule C, 30 Stat. 166 (U. S. Comp. St.' 1901, p. 1644), is exclusive. On the merits the Board of General Appraisers and the Circuit Court ruled correctly.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 64 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 319 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)
Tower v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 55 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)
National Zinc Co. v. United States
7 Ct. Cust. 145 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 F. 122, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brewster-ca5-1909.