C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Cust. Ct. 107
United States Customs Court·Decided October 21, 1960·No. No. 64766; protest 60/16394 (Niagara Falls)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 336 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 336 (C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tower v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 36 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)