C. H. Boehringer Sohn, a Partnership v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
This text of 256 F.2d 713 (C. H. Boehringer Sohn, a Partnership v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A patent applicant appeals from a judgment for the Commissioner of Patents in a suit under 35 U.S.C. § 145. The Patent Office tribunals found in terms, and the District Court in substance, that there was no invention. Since these findings do not appear to us to be unreasonable or clearly erroneous, we must affirm the judgment in favor of the Commissioner. “The presumption that the Patent Office is right is reenforced, in the present case, by the presumption that the trial court is right.” Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 197, 109 F.2d 449, 451.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 F.2d 713, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 117 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 223, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-h-boehringer-sohn-a-partnership-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-cadc-1958.