C & C Co. v. Seattle First National Bank (In re Coal-X Ltd.)

Tenth Circuit

C & C Co. v. Seattle First National Bank (In re Coal-X Ltd.)

881 F.2d 865, 1989 WL 81825

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 26, 1989·No. No. 86-2557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

We affirm the decision of the district court which reversed, in part, the bankruptcy court. We affirm for the reasons given in the district court’s opinion which we have directed to be published. 103 B.R. 276. The rule established in that opinion is that 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (1982) providing for equitable apportionment prevails over a contrary state rule providing for nonapportionment of rents. In this we join the Second Circuit. S & W Holding Co. v. Kuriansky, 317 F.2d 666 (2d Cir. 1963).

The district court correctly found that the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to add interest to the amount secured by the landlord’s lien. The landlord is entitled to interest on the full $85,000 accruing from May 1, 1984, to May 18, 1984. To the extent that it can be read otherwise, the district court opinion is reversed on that point.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

We affirm the decision of the district court which reversed, in part, the bankruptcy court. We affirm for the reasons given in the district court’s opinion which we have directed to be published. 103 B.R. 276. The rule established in that opinion is that 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (1982) providing for equitable apportionment prevails over a contrary state rule providing for nonapportionment of rents. In this we join the Second Circuit. S & W Holding Co. v. Kuriansky, 317 F.2d 666 (2d Cir. 1963).

The district court correctly found that the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to add interest to the amount secured by the landlord’s lien. The landlord is entitled to interest on the full $85,000 accruing from May 1, 1984, to May 18, 1984. To the extent that it can be read otherwise, the district court opinion is reversed on that point.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

C & C Co. v. Seattle First National Bank (In re Coal-X Ltd.), 881 F.2d 865, 1989 WL 81825 (10th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

881 F.2d 865 (C & C Co. v. Seattle First National Bank (In re Coal-X Ltd.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related