Byrne v. Byrne
57 Cal. 348
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order changing the place of trial. The motion was based upon affidavits, but no demand in writing was filed. The notice of the motion was not a demand. (See § 396, Code Civ. Proc.; Estrada v. Oreña, 54 Cal. 407.)
Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Byrne v. Byrne, 57 Cal. 348 (Cal. 1881).
57 Cal. 348 (Byrne v. Byrne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Land Investment Co.
265 N.W. 410 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. District Court
231 P. 395 (Montana Supreme Court, 1924)
Bithorn v. Ball
17 P.R. 549 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)
Anderson v. Arpin Hardwood Lumber Co.
110 N.W. 788 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Warner v. Warner
34 P. 523 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Pennie v. Visher
29 P. 711 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Elam v. Griffin
19 Nev. 442 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1887)