Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Byrd v. State

Byrd v. State

913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 235, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 52
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 Ark. 10 →
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 29, 1996·No. CR 96-48·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Michael Wayne Byrd, by his attorney, Scott E. Smith, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. State, 913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 235, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 52 (Ark. 1996).

913 S.W.2d 305 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Harkness v. State
572 S.W.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)