Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Byrd v. State

Byrd v. State

913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 235, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 52
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 29, 1996
DocketCR 96-48
StatusPublished

This text of 913 S.W.2d 305 (Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. State, 913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 235, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 52 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Michael Wayne Byrd, by his attorney, Scott E. Smith, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Harkness v. State
572 S.W.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 235, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-state-ark-1996.