Byrd v. Roneker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Byrd v. Roneker

90 A.D.3d 1651, 934 N.Y.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 2011

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.3d 1651 (Byrd v. Roneker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. Roneker, 90 A.D.3d 1651, 934 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting in part the motion of defendant Frederick E. Roneker, Jr. to settle the record on appeal and including plaintiffs memorandum of law therein for the sole purpose of determining whether certain of plaintiffs contentions are preserved for our review and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Byrd v Roneker (90 AD3d 1648 [2011]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting in part the motion of defendant Frederick E. Roneker, Jr. to settle the record on appeal and including plaintiffs memorandum of law therein for the sole purpose of determining whether certain of plaintiffs contentions are preserved for our review and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Byrd v Roneker (90 AD3d 1648 [2011]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.3d 1651, 934 N.Y.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-roneker-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack