B.W.H. v. State
904 So. 2d 659, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10132
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2005·No. No. 5D04-1974·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
We affirm on the authority of S.S.M. v. State, 898 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). We certify in this case the same question we previously certified in V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005):
DOES A TRIAL JUDGE HAVE THE POWER AND AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ON JUVENILES IN A JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 930.085?
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B.W.H. v. State, 904 So. 2d 659, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
904 So. 2d 659 (B.W.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
B.W.H. v. State
954 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
B.W.H. v. State
950 So. 2d 403 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
BHW v. State
904 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)