BHW v. State

904 So. 2d 659, 2005 WL 1537258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2005·No. 5D04-1974·Published

Opinion

904 So.2d 659 (2005)

B.W.H., A Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D04-1974.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 2005.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

GRIFFIN, J.

We affirm on the authority of S.S.M. v. State, 898 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). We certify in this case the same question we previously certified in V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005):

DOES A TRIAL JUDGE HAVE THE POWER AND AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ON JUVENILES IN A JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 930.085?

AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

SHARP, W., and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BHW v. State, 904 So. 2d 659, 2005 WL 1537258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

904 So. 2d 659 (BHW v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.S.M. v. State
898 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
V.K.E. v. State
902 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
B.W.H. v. State
904 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)