Butts v. State

686 So. 2d 1297, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, 1996 WL 342274
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJune 21, 1996
DocketCR-95-0937
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 686 So. 2d 1297 (Butts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butts v. State, 686 So. 2d 1297, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, 1996 WL 342274 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

Robert L. Butts appeals from his probation revocation. At the hearing, he [1298]*1298admitted that he failed to report to his probation officer and pay supervision fees. Thus, we reject his claim that his probation was revoked without evidence. Yet, there is no written order. We remand this case for production of a written statement of evidence relied upon by the trial court and its reasons for the revocation. Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975).

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur except COBB, J., who is not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burrows v. State
695 So. 2d 257 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Butts v. State
686 So. 2d 1298 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 1297, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, 1996 WL 342274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-state-alacrimapp-1996.