Butts v. Jamaludeen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7398

WAYNE DOUGLAS BUTTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR JAMALUDEEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-424)

Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: January 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Douglas Butts, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -