Butts v. Jamaludeen

Fourth Circuit

Butts v. Jamaludeen

161 F. App'x 333

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2006·No. No. 05-7398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Butts v. Jamaludeen, 161 F. App'x 333 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 333 (Butts v. Jamaludeen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related