Butterworth v. Morgan

22 So. 3d 478, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 1363868
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 15, 2009
Docket1080109
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 So. 3d 478 (Butterworth v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butterworth v. Morgan, 22 So. 3d 478, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 1363868 (Ala. 2009).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). See Rules 39(a)(1)(D) and 39(d)(3), Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and LYONS, WOODALL, SMITH, BOLIN, and PARKER, JJ„ concur. MURDOCK, J., concurs specially. STUART, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butterworth v. Morgan
22 So. 3d 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 So. 3d 478, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 1363868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterworth-v-morgan-ala-2009.