Butterfield v. Kinzie

2 Ill. 445
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ill. 445 (Butterfield v. Kinzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butterfield v. Kinzie, 2 Ill. 445 (Ill. 1838).

Opinion

Wilson, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The only question presented for adjudication by the record in this cause, is whether or not in an action against the maker of a promissory note, or the acceptor of a bill, payable at a specified place, the plaintiff is bound to aver and prove a demand of payment at the time and place specified, to maintain the action. The negative of this proposition is maintained by the plaintiff in error, and the affirmative by the defendant. Without going into an examination-of the numerous decisions bearing upon the question, or the reasons advanced in support of those decisions, this Court has no hesitation in saying, that the weight and current of authorities fully sustain the position assumed by the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. McConnell
38 U.S. 136 (Supreme Court, 1839)
Bank of Kentucky v. Hickey
14 Ky. 225 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ill. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butterfield-v-kinzie-ill-1838.