Butler v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Butler v. State

130 S.E. 372, 34 Ga. App. 516, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 370

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1925

Docket16788

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 372 (Butler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler v. State, 130 S.E. 372, 34 Ga. App. 516, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The admission of the evidence of the arresting officer, that he “noticed a bulky something in his [the defendant’s] pocket, and . . went in his pocket and got his pistol,” was not error. Smith v. State, 17 Ga. App. 693.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge and the facts of the case, show no reversible error.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

1. The admission of the evidence of the arresting officer, that he “noticed a bulky something in his [the defendant’s] pocket, and . . went in his pocket and got his pistol,” was not error. Smith v. State, 17 Ga. App. 693.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge and the facts of the case, show no reversible error.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E. 372, 34 Ga. App. 516, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-state-gactapp-1925.

Opinion

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack