Butler v. State
941 So. 2d 430, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16912, 2006 WL 2873218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2006·No. No. 3D06-1642·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(“ ‘a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion’ ” (quoting Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993)))(emphasis added).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butler v. State, 941 So. 2d 430, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16912, 2006 WL 2873218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
941 So. 2d 430 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler v. State
95 So. 3d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)