Butler v. State

884 So. 2d 381, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2004 WL 2008268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Butler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 807 So. 2d 88
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2004·No. No. 2D03-4139·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

In this certiorari proceeding Daniel Butler challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reduce, mitigate, or modify his sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Butler contended he was entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent in jail awaiting sentencing. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Brantley v. Holloway, 685 So.2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We note, however, that Butler’s argument is cognizable under rule 3.800(a). See Tinker v. State, 870 So.2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Our disposition is without prejudice to Butler’s right to file a motion for relief under that rule.

Petition for certiorari denied.

CANADY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. State, 884 So. 2d 381, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2004 WL 2008268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 381 (Butler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinker v. State
870 So. 2d 79 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Brantley v. Holloway
685 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)