Butler v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2017 Ark. App. 202
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedApril 5, 2017
DocketCV-16-1063
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ark. App. 202 (Butler v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 202 (Ark. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No.CV-16-1063 Opinion Delivered: April 5, 2017 CRYSTAL BUTLER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 70JV-13-271]

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR HONORABLE EDWIN KEATON, CHILDREN JUDGE APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

This is an appeal arising from the order of the Union County Circuit Court

terminating appellant Crystal Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1, E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and

K.A.B. Butler’s attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel. On

appeal, counsel contends that there are no meritorious grounds that could possibly support

an appeal.

In compliance with Linker–Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark.

131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Rule 6-9(i) (2016) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme

Court and Court of Appeals, Butler’s counsel has examined the entire supplemented record

for adverse rulings and has noted that, apart from the termination, there were no rulings

adverse to Butler. Counsel has adequately discussed why there is no arguable merit to an

appeal. Butler was provided a copy of her counsel’s brief and motion, and she exercised her Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202

right to file pro se points on appeal. Neither the Arkansas Department of Human Services

nor the attorney ad litem filed a responsive brief.

Having carefully examined the pro se points filed by Butler, the record, and the no-

merit brief, we hold that Butler’s counsel has complied with the requirements for no-merit,

parental-termination appeals and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, by

memorandum opinion, we affirm the termination of Butler’s parental rights to E.M.1,

E.M.2, K.B., J.M., and K.A.B. In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d

63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw from

representation of Butler.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GRUBER, C.J., and WHITEAKER, J., agree.

Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
194 S.W.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ark. App. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2017.