Butler v. Accessible Healthcare Solutions L L C

District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided July 28, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-00180·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

ALBERT BUTLER CASE NO. 19-cv-180

JUDGE DRELL ACCESSIBLE HEALTHCARE MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES SOLUTIONS L.L.C., ET AL

ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff Albert Butler’s “Motion to Approve Attorney’s Fees.” (Doc. 44). The motion is filed in response to the court’s granting of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant 29 §U.S.C. §216(b) and its order directing Plaintiff's counsel to provide his lodestar calculation for consideration. (Doc. 42 and 43). The Fifth Circuit applies a two-part process in determining reasonable attorney’s fees. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Kellstrom, 50 F.3d 319, 323-24 (5" Cir.1995). First, the court must determine the reasonable hourly rate for attorneys that worked on the case and the reasonable number of hours spent doing so. Id. at 324. Second, the court multiplies the reasonable number of hours by the reasonable hourly rates. Id. The number produced from that calculation is called the lodestar. Id. “There is a strong presumption that the lodestar is the reasonable fee.” Walker v. U.S. Dep’t. of Hous. & Urban Dev., 99 F.3d 761, 771 (5™ Cir.1996). The court must determine the total number of hours claimed for reimbursement are reasonable and “exclude all time that is excessive, duplicative, or inadequately documented.” Watkins v. Fordice, 7 F. 3d 453, 457 (5" Cir. 1993). When attorneys submit time reports to the court, the record should evidence “billing judgment.” Saizan v. Delta Concrete Products Co., Inc., 448 F.3d 795, 799 (5" Cir.2006). “Billing judgment requires documentation of the hours charged

and the hours written off as unproductive, excessive, or redundant.” Id. When attorneys fail to billing judgment, the district court may “reduce the hours awarded by a percentage intended to substitute for the exercise of billing judgment.” Walker, 99 F.3d at770. The time report provided by Plaintiff's counsel indicates that 16.8 billable hours were performed by him at the hourly rate of $250. The court finds the hourly rate reasonable and determines the lodestar to be $4,200. The court further finds adequate billing judgment was exercised by Plaintiff’s counsel. Thus, the total amount of reasonable attorney’s fees is $4,200. Plaintiff’s counsel is also entitled to reasonable costs incurred in this case. Counsel requests $83.20 incurred in postage and to effect service of process. We find those costs reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Accessible Healthcare Solutions, LLC and Geeth Perera must pay Albert Butler’s attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,283.20 for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred. sia THUS DONE AND SIGNED this C3 day of July 2021, at Alexandria, Louisiana.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Accessible Healthcare Solutions L L C, (W.D. La. 2021).

Butler v. Accessible Healthcare Solutions L L C (Butler v. Accessible Healthcare Solutions L L C) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related