Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan

703 N.E.2d 317, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1216
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Ohio St. 3d 300
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1998·No. No. 97-2259·Published

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas Derivan, Attorney Registration No. 0006092, last known business address in Middletown, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of April 1, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas Derivan, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 300, 691 N.E.2d 256.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer,'Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan, 703 N.E.2d 317, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Ohio 1998).

703 N.E.2d 317 (Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan
691 N.E.2d 256 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)