Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan

691 N.E.2d 256, 81 Ohio St. 3d 300
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2259
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 691 N.E.2d 256 (Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan, 691 N.E.2d 256, 81 Ohio St. 3d 300 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we believe a more severe sanction is warranted. This case involves more than respondent’s negligence in failing to file a case within the appropriate statute of limitations. Respondent deliberately manufactured a document to exonerate himself and presented it as genuine in a formal disciplinary proceeding. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney.
2017 Ohio 8799 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)
Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan
703 N.E.2d 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan
1998 Ohio 546 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler
1998 Ohio 39 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 N.E.2d 256, 81 Ohio St. 3d 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-county-bar-assn-v-derivan-ohio-1998.