Busy Bee, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, NA
959 A.2d 318, 598 Pa. 778
Opinion
BUSY BEE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, BABY BEE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, MLL CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND JASAMI CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, TRADING AS CENTURY SHOES, LTD., A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND CARLTON SHOES, LTD., A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, TRADING AS BLS ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Respondent,
v.
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TO CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.
Mr. Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Busy Bee, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, NA, 959 A.2d 318, 598 Pa. 778 (Pa. 2008).
959 A.2d 318 (Busy Bee, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Knitney Lines, Inc.
34 Pa. D. & C.5th 46 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Thattayathu v. Trikha
33 Pa. D. & C.5th 347 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Eastern Roofing Systems, Inc. v. Cestone
25 Pa. D. & C.5th 394 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2012)
Sparrow v. PACE/CM, Inc.
22 Pa. D. & C.5th 5 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2011)
Rizzo v. MSA, Inc.
18 Pa. D. & C.5th 233 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2010)