Bustamonte v. Koval

98 A.D.2d 739, 469 N.Y.S.2d 441, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21049
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, defendant Raymond Koval appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated March 15, 1983, which denied his motion for summary judgment in his favor based on plaintiff’s failure to timely serve a bill of particulars pursuant to a prior conditional order of preclusion. Order reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against defendant Koval granted. Plaintiff has failed to establish the legal merits of this action by an affidavit from a physician competent to attest to the meritorious nature of his claim (see Amodeo v Radler, 89 AD2d 594, affd 59 NY2d 1001; Smith v Lefrak Organization, 60 NY2d 828; Lee v Moley, 97 AD2d 787). Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bustamonte v. Koval, 98 A.D.2d 739, 469 N.Y.S.2d 441, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

98 A.D.2d 739 (Bustamonte v. Koval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masucci v. Feder
196 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Burt v. Lenox Hill Hospital
141 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Fiore v. Galang
105 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)