Amodeo v. Radler
This text of 453 N.E.2d 1242 (Amodeo v. Radler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiffs failed to establish any merit to their cause of action. Failing that, it was proper for the court to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Indig v Finkelstein, 23 NY2d 728.)
[1003]*1003It is thus unnecessary for us, at this time, to address the recently enacted amendments to the CPLR to allow the lower courts to exercise discretion “to excuse delay or default resulting from law office failure.” (CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d].)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 N.E.2d 1242, 59 N.Y.2d 1001, 466 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodeo-v-radler-ny-1983.