1 WO 2 3 4 5
9 Julian Abraham Bustamante, No. CV-23-00022-TUC-RM
10 Plaintiff, ORDER
11 v.
12 Tony Taylor, et al.,
13 Defendants. 14 15 On February 1, 2024, this Court granted default judgment as to liability against 16 Defendant Tony Taylor and set an evidentiary hearing on damages for March 21, 2024 at 17 1:30 p.m. (Doc. 38.) Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for 18 Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum (Doc. 39), Motion for Issuance of 19 Subpoena (Doc. 40), and Motion to Obtain Medical Files from Arizona Department of 20 Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (Doc. 41). 21 I. Motion for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 22 Plaintiff states that he would like to appear in person at the evidentiary hearing, 23 and he asks the Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. (Doc. 39.) 24 “[I]mprisonment suspends [a] plaintiff’s usual right to be personally present at 25 judicial proceedings brought by himself or on his behalf.” Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 26 F.2d 768, 770 (9th Cir. 1989). However, a district court has “power to issue a writ of 27 habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure the testimony of a [] prisoner witness.” Wiggins 28 v. Alameda Cnty., 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (citing Ballard v. 1 Spradley, 557 F.2d 476, 480 (5th Cir. 1977)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(5). In 2 determining whether to issue a writ to secure a prisoner’s physical presence at trial, 3 district courts consider (1) “whether the prisoner’s presence will substantially further the 4 resolution of the case”; (2) “the security risks presented by the prisoner’s presence”; (3) 5 “the expense of the prisoner’s transportation and safekeeping”; and (4) “whether the suit 6 can be stayed until the prisoner is released without prejudice to the cause asserted.” 7 Wiggins, 717 F.2d at 468 n.1 (quoting Ballard, 557 F.2d at 480). The focus of the 8 inquiry is “the need for the prisoner’s testimony vis-à-vis the difficulties attendant to 9 securing it.” Ballard, 557 F.2d at 481. Videoconferencing offers a viable alternative to 10 in-person appearance that allows for an inmate plaintiff to meaningfully participate in a 11 hearing while alleviating the cost and expense associated with transporting the inmate to 12 the courthouse. See Montes v. Rafalowski, No. C 09-0976 RMW, 2012 WL 2395273, at 13 *2 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2012); Perotti v. Quinones, 790 F.3d 712, 723-24 (7th Cir. 2015). 14 Plaintiff’s Motion does not address any of the factors that this Court must consider 15 in determining whether to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure an 16 inmate plaintiff’s in-person appearance. Furthermore, Plaintiff does not address why his 17 appearance via videoconference technology is an unacceptable alternative to an in-person 18 appearance. The Court will accordingly deny Plaintiff’s Motion with leave to re-file a 19 motion that addresses the appropriate factors. 20 II. Motion for Issuance of Subpoena 21 Plaintiff asks the Court to issue a subpoena commanding him to appear in Court 22 for the evidentiary hearing. (Doc. 40.) The Court has already ordered Plaintiff to appear 23 at the evidentiary hearing via videoconference technology (Doc. 38 at 5), and there is no 24 need for Plaintiff to subpoena himself. Accordingly, the Court will deny this Motion as 25 moot. 26 III. Motion to Obtain Medical Files 27 Plaintiff asks the Court to grant him print outs of his medical files from October 7, 28 2022, to February 10, 2024, for use in the evidentiary hearing currently set for March 21, 1 2024. (Doc. 41.) If Plaintiff wishes to use his medical files at the evidentiary hearing, he 2 may seek copies of the files via an informal request to the Arizona Department of 3 Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, or he may move for issuance of a subpoena 4 commanding the custodian of the records to produce the files to him. Any motion for 5 issuance of a subpoena shall comply with General Order 18-19 and include a copy of the 6 proposed subpoena. The Court will direct the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank Subpoena to 7 Produce Documents (form AO 88B), to assist Plaintiff in filing a motion that complies 8 with General Order 18-19. 9 IV. Continuance of Evidentiary Hearing 10 To allow time to resolve any re-filed motion for issuance of writ of habeas corpus 11 ad testificandum and any motion for issuance of a subpoena to produce medical files, the 12 Court will continue the evidentiary hearing to May 16, 2024. 13 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus 14 Ad Testificandum (Doc. 39) is denied without prejudice and with leave to re-file a 15 motion that addresses the appropriate factors, as set forth above. 16 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of Subpoena (Doc. 40) is 17 denied as moot. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Obtain Medical Files is 19 denied, with leave to file a motion for issuance of a subpoena commanding the custodian 20 of record to produce the requested medical files. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail 21 Plaintiff a blank Subpoena to Produce Documents (form AO 88b). 22 . . . . 23 . . . . 24 . . . . 25 . . . . 26 . . . . 27 . . . . 28 . . . . 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing currently set for March 21, 2024 is vacated and reset to May 16, 2024 at 1:30 p.m., before the || Honorable Rosemary Marquez, in Courtroom 5A of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse, 405 W. Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701. Unless otherwise ordered, Plaintiff shall appear at the evidentiary || hearing via videoconference technology. 7 Dated this 12th day of March, 2024. 8 9 ff 10 — Wf’ ll TD 4 tigi Z □□ Honorable Rosthary Mgfquez 12 United States District □□□□□ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-4-
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ) Defendant ) SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION To: (Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed) O Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached — Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance; Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so. Date: CLERK OF COURT OR Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) , who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 WO 2 3 4 5
9 Julian Abraham Bustamante, No. CV-23-00022-TUC-RM
10 Plaintiff, ORDER
11 v.
12 Tony Taylor, et al.,
13 Defendants. 14 15 On February 1, 2024, this Court granted default judgment as to liability against 16 Defendant Tony Taylor and set an evidentiary hearing on damages for March 21, 2024 at 17 1:30 p.m. (Doc. 38.) Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for 18 Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum (Doc. 39), Motion for Issuance of 19 Subpoena (Doc. 40), and Motion to Obtain Medical Files from Arizona Department of 20 Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (Doc. 41). 21 I. Motion for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 22 Plaintiff states that he would like to appear in person at the evidentiary hearing, 23 and he asks the Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. (Doc. 39.) 24 “[I]mprisonment suspends [a] plaintiff’s usual right to be personally present at 25 judicial proceedings brought by himself or on his behalf.” Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 26 F.2d 768, 770 (9th Cir. 1989). However, a district court has “power to issue a writ of 27 habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure the testimony of a [] prisoner witness.” Wiggins 28 v. Alameda Cnty., 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (citing Ballard v. 1 Spradley, 557 F.2d 476, 480 (5th Cir. 1977)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(5). In 2 determining whether to issue a writ to secure a prisoner’s physical presence at trial, 3 district courts consider (1) “whether the prisoner’s presence will substantially further the 4 resolution of the case”; (2) “the security risks presented by the prisoner’s presence”; (3) 5 “the expense of the prisoner’s transportation and safekeeping”; and (4) “whether the suit 6 can be stayed until the prisoner is released without prejudice to the cause asserted.” 7 Wiggins, 717 F.2d at 468 n.1 (quoting Ballard, 557 F.2d at 480). The focus of the 8 inquiry is “the need for the prisoner’s testimony vis-à-vis the difficulties attendant to 9 securing it.” Ballard, 557 F.2d at 481. Videoconferencing offers a viable alternative to 10 in-person appearance that allows for an inmate plaintiff to meaningfully participate in a 11 hearing while alleviating the cost and expense associated with transporting the inmate to 12 the courthouse. See Montes v. Rafalowski, No. C 09-0976 RMW, 2012 WL 2395273, at 13 *2 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2012); Perotti v. Quinones, 790 F.3d 712, 723-24 (7th Cir. 2015). 14 Plaintiff’s Motion does not address any of the factors that this Court must consider 15 in determining whether to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure an 16 inmate plaintiff’s in-person appearance. Furthermore, Plaintiff does not address why his 17 appearance via videoconference technology is an unacceptable alternative to an in-person 18 appearance. The Court will accordingly deny Plaintiff’s Motion with leave to re-file a 19 motion that addresses the appropriate factors. 20 II. Motion for Issuance of Subpoena 21 Plaintiff asks the Court to issue a subpoena commanding him to appear in Court 22 for the evidentiary hearing. (Doc. 40.) The Court has already ordered Plaintiff to appear 23 at the evidentiary hearing via videoconference technology (Doc. 38 at 5), and there is no 24 need for Plaintiff to subpoena himself. Accordingly, the Court will deny this Motion as 25 moot. 26 III. Motion to Obtain Medical Files 27 Plaintiff asks the Court to grant him print outs of his medical files from October 7, 28 2022, to February 10, 2024, for use in the evidentiary hearing currently set for March 21, 1 2024. (Doc. 41.) If Plaintiff wishes to use his medical files at the evidentiary hearing, he 2 may seek copies of the files via an informal request to the Arizona Department of 3 Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, or he may move for issuance of a subpoena 4 commanding the custodian of the records to produce the files to him. Any motion for 5 issuance of a subpoena shall comply with General Order 18-19 and include a copy of the 6 proposed subpoena. The Court will direct the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank Subpoena to 7 Produce Documents (form AO 88B), to assist Plaintiff in filing a motion that complies 8 with General Order 18-19. 9 IV. Continuance of Evidentiary Hearing 10 To allow time to resolve any re-filed motion for issuance of writ of habeas corpus 11 ad testificandum and any motion for issuance of a subpoena to produce medical files, the 12 Court will continue the evidentiary hearing to May 16, 2024. 13 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus 14 Ad Testificandum (Doc. 39) is denied without prejudice and with leave to re-file a 15 motion that addresses the appropriate factors, as set forth above. 16 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of Subpoena (Doc. 40) is 17 denied as moot. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Obtain Medical Files is 19 denied, with leave to file a motion for issuance of a subpoena commanding the custodian 20 of record to produce the requested medical files. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail 21 Plaintiff a blank Subpoena to Produce Documents (form AO 88b). 22 . . . . 23 . . . . 24 . . . . 25 . . . . 26 . . . . 27 . . . . 28 . . . . 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing currently set for March 21, 2024 is vacated and reset to May 16, 2024 at 1:30 p.m., before the || Honorable Rosemary Marquez, in Courtroom 5A of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse, 405 W. Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701. Unless otherwise ordered, Plaintiff shall appear at the evidentiary || hearing via videoconference technology. 7 Dated this 12th day of March, 2024. 8 9 ff 10 — Wf’ ll TD 4 tigi Z □□ Honorable Rosthary Mgfquez 12 United States District □□□□□ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-4-
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ) Defendant ) SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION To: (Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed) O Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached — Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance; Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so. Date: CLERK OF COURT OR Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) , who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (Page 2) Civil Action No. PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.) received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) on (date) . I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:
on (date) ; or [returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of $ My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date: Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
(c) Place of Compliance. (ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s (1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a study that was not requested by a party. person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows: (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances (A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or regularly transacts business in person; or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified (B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularly conditions if the serving party: transacts business in person, if the person (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be (i) is a party or a party’s officer; or otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantial (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. expense. (e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. (2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command: (A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, is procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored employed, or regularly transacts business in person; and information: (B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected. (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or (d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement. must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. (1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include person responding need not produce the same electronically stored lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney who information in more than one form. fails to comply. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information (2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to order, the person responding must show that the information is not permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the hearing, or trial. requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery. things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for material must: compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, (i) expressly make the claim; and the following rules apply: (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. order compelling production or inspection. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party significant expense resulting from compliance. that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district where until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that: information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; present the information under seal to the court for the district where (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits compliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who specified in Rule 45(c); produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no resolved. exception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (g) Contempt. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a person motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, subpoena or an order related to it. development, or commercial information; or For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).