Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.
Opinion
Wq. should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that án application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was- rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. M'Arthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibbald v. United States, 12 Pet. 488 ; Brooks v. Railroad Company, 102 U. S.107 ; Williams v. Conger, 131 U. S. 390.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
150 U.S. 82 (Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.