Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bush v. State

Bush v. State

813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2063, 2002 WL 271436
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bush v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 809 So. 2d 107 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. No. 4D01-4181·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we certify the following question:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

STONE, SHAHOOD, and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bush v. State, 813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2063, 2002 WL 271436 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

813 So. 2d 974 (Bush v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stretcher v. State
803 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)