Bush v. State
813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2063, 2002 WL 271436
This text of 813 So. 2d 974 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bush v. State, 813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2063, 2002 WL 271436 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Affirmed. As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we certify the following question:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stretcher v. State
803 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2063, 2002 WL 271436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.