Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2005·No. 05-1029·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1029

LARRY LAMONT BUSH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BENNET AND NATHANS, L.L.P., a/k/a Nathans and Biddle, L.L.P., a/k/a Bennett and Laylor, L.L.P.; FRED W. BENNETT, attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 3710-AMD)

Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this breach of contract action for lack of jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P., No. CA-04-3710-AMD

(D. Md. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP, (4th Cir. 2005).

Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP (Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.