Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP
This text of Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP (Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1029
LARRY LAMONT BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENNET AND NATHANS, L.L.P., a/k/a Nathans and Biddle, L.L.P., a/k/a Bennett and Laylor, L.L.P.; FRED W. BENNETT, attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 3710-AMD)
Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this breach of contract action for lack of jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P., No. CA-04-3710-AMD
(D. Md. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bush v. Bennet Nathans LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-bennet-nathans-llp-ca4-2005.