Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P.

Fourth Circuit

Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P.

126 F. App'x 146

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2005·No. No. 05-1029·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order dismissing this breach of contract action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P., No. CA-04-3710-AMD (D. Md. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [147]*147presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order dismissing this breach of contract action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P., No. CA-04-3710-AMD (D. Md. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [147]*147presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P., 126 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 146 (Bush v. Bennet & Nathans, L.L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.