Busch v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of N.Y.
18 N.E.2d 39, 279 N.Y. 640, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 887
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the affirmative, and second question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Busch v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of N.Y., 18 N.E.2d 39, 279 N.Y. 640, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 887 (N.Y. 1938).
18 N.E.2d 39 (Busch v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of N.Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
González Azcuy v. Universal Solar Products, Inc.
167 P.R. Dec. 82 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2006)
Miguel González Azcuy en Su Calidad De Albacea De Alberto Ruisánchez Mayoral E Irma Febles Feito v. Universal Solar Products TS, INC.; Alfa Casting, Corp; Energy Solar Products, INC.; World Financial Corp.; René Ruisánchez Mayoral; Marái Del Carmen Gelabert García Y Moisés Almansa Pequeño
2006 TSPR 18 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2006)