Burton v. State

745 So. 2d 426, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14539, 1999 WL 992686
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 771 So. 2d 1291
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1999·No. No. 98-01689·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

On appeal, Kenneth Burton raises two issues of which only one merits discussion. Burton raised a theory of self-defense. His trial counsel attempted to question Burton concerning prior acts of violence by the victim of which he was aware. The trial court improperly precluded the introduction of this evidence. See Smith v. State, 661 So.2d 358, 361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). However, this court cannot ascertain whether this resulted in reversible error because trial counsel failed to make a proffer of the testimony Burton would have given had he been allowed to testify. See Williams v. State, 600 So.2d 524, 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The error, if any, was not preserved.

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. State, 745 So. 2d 426, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14539, 1999 WL 992686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

745 So. 2d 426 (Burton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
600 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Smith v. State
661 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)