Burton v. Hicks

27 La. 507
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1875
DocketNo. 5521
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 La. 507 (Burton v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burton v. Hicks, 27 La. 507 (La. 1875).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

Ludeling, C. J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal has been made, on tbe ground that the certificate to the transcript is signe t by the deputy clerk. The motion is refused for the following reasons:

First — Because the motion was not filed within three judicial days after the return day. 17 An. 21; 18 An. 191; 19 An. 276; 20 An. 30 ; 21 An. 329 ; 11 An. 545; 7 N. S. 271.

Second — Because a defect in a certificate would be no cause to dismiss an appeal, the fault being attributable to the officer, whose duty it is to make the certificate. Revised Statutes, section 36.

Third — Because a deputy clerk is an officer known to the law, and he is authorized to sign certificates. C. P. 782; 3 An. 247, Downs v. Tarkington ; 15 La. 33, Bank of Louisiana v. Watson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holahan v. Guirovich
220 So. 2d 527 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 La. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-hicks-la-1875.