Burt v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Burt v. Kurtz

5 Rawle 246, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 39

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 16, 1835

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Rawle 246 (Burt v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burt v. Kurtz, 5 Rawle 246, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 39 (Pa. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A claim to perpetuate the lien of a mechanic or material man, if within time in other respects, may undoubtedly be well filed after a judicial sale of the premises. Where the purchase money is substituted for the land, there is no reason why the lien should not attach itself to it, as it would to the land in the hands of the purchaser, were it liable to the charge. The liens in question, therefore, were properly allowed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A claim to perpetuate the lien of a mechanic or material man, if within time in other respects, may undoubtedly be well filed after a judicial sale of the premises. Where the purchase money is substituted for the land, there is no reason why the lien should not attach itself to it, as it would to the land in the hands of the purchaser, were it liable to the charge. The liens in question, therefore, were properly allowed.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Rawle 246, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burt-v-kurtz-pa-1835.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack