Burrell v. Shepard
This text of Burrell v. Shepard (Burrell v. Shepard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) STEFANIE BURRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1837 (EGS) ) ALICA SHEPARD, DANIEL CIPULLO, ) and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendants. ) )
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts
I, II, III, and IV is DENIED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss Count V
is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Ms. Burrell’s 42 U.S.C. §
1983 claim against Daniel Cipullo is DISMISSED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss Count VI
is GRANTED. Ms. Burrell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the
District of Columbia is DISMISSED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file an Answer to Ms.
Burrell’s amended complaint by no later than August 13, 2018.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Court Judge July 27, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burrell v. Shepard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrell-v-shepard-dcd-2018.