Burrage v. Briggs
120 Mass. 103, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 124
Opinion
The residuary bequest was to Enos Briggs absolutely, and by his death, without issue, lapsed and went to the adopted child of the testatrix. Sohier v. Inches, 12 Gray, 385. Kimball v. Story, 108 Mass. 382. Sewall v. Roberts, 115 Mass. 262. St. 1871, c. 310, § 8. Decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burrage v. Briggs, 120 Mass. 103, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 124 (Mass. 1876).
120 Mass. 103 (Burrage v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harle v. Harle
166 S.W. 674 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
In re Walworth's Estate
82 A. 7 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1912)
Lichter v. Thiers
121 N.W. 153 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Ferguson v. Herr
90 N.W. 625 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1902)
Glascott v. Bragg
56 L.R.A. 258 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
New York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Viele
55 N.E. 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Russell v. Russell
84 Ala. 48 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Power v. Hafley
4 S.W. 683 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1887)
Humphries v. Davis
100 Ind. 274 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Hole v. Robbins
10 N.W. 617 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1881)
Tirrell v. Bacon
3 F. 62 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1880)