Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

283 N.W. 750, 204 Minn. 348, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 569
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 Minn. 391
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 27, 1939·No. No. 31,882.·Published

Opinion

*349 Pee Curiam.

This action to recover for default of an administrator against his surety was commenced November 20, 1937. Final decree determining and directing distribution of the estate was entered November 14, 1929. Judgment was ordered below on the pleadings because the statute of limitations had run. The attempted appeal is from the order for judgment. (Judgment has not been entered.) That order is not appealable, and hence the appeal must be dismissed. State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463, 174 N. W. 611.

Inasmuch as we have heard the argument, it may not be amiss to say that the decision below appears correct under the rule of Ganser v. Ganser, 83 Minn. 199, 86 N. W. 18, 85 A. S. R. 461.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 283 N.W. 750, 204 Minn. 348, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 569 (Mich. 1939).

283 N.W. 750 (Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ganser v. Ganser
86 N.W. 18 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1901)
State ex rel. Quale v. Penney
174 N.W. 611 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)