State ex rel. Quale v. Penney
174 N.W. 611, 144 Minn. 463, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763
Opinion
The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 174 N.W. 611, 144 Minn. 463, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763 (Mich. 1919).
174 N.W. 611 (State ex rel. Quale v. Penney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney
4 N.W.2d 348 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
283 N.W. 750 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1939)