State ex rel. Quale v. Penney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State ex rel. Quale v. Penney

174 N.W. 611, 144 Minn. 463, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 21, 1919

DocketNo. 21,550

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 N.W. 611 (State ex rel. Quale v. Penney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 174 N.W. 611, 144 Minn. 463, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763 (Mich. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 N.W. 611, 144 Minn. 463, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-quale-v-penney-minn-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack