BURNS v. CLINE

2014 OK 90
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 4, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 OK 90 (BURNS v. CLINE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BURNS v. CLINE, 2014 OK 90 (Okla. 2014).

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:BURNS v. CLINE
  1. Home
  2. Courts
  3. Court Dockets
  4. Legal Research
  5. Calendar
  6. Help
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

BURNS v. CLINE
2014 OK 90
Case Number: 113342
Decided: 11/04/2014
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA


Cite as: 2014 OK 90, __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.


Larry A. Burns, D.O., on behalf of himself and his patients, Appellants,
v.
Terry L. Cline, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health, Carl B. Pettigrew, D.O., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, and Greg Mashburn, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Cleveland, Garvin, and McClain Counties, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

¶1 This opinion addresses only the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of Senate Bill 1848, 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 370 (effective November 1, 2014) (Act). Appellant's constitutional challenge to the enactment remains pending in the trial court. Upon consideration of "Appellant's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Injunction or, in the Alternative, an Emergency Stay of the District Court's Order to Preserve the Status Quo", and pursuant to the authority provided by Article 7, section 4, of the Oklahoma Constitution, this Court temporarily enjoins enforcement of the Act until the constitutionality of the Act is fully and finally litigated.

¶2 This matter is remanded to the trial court for determination of the constitutional challenge to the Act to be memorialized by findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court expresses no opinion concerning the validity of the Act.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
None Found.
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BURNS v. CLINE
2014 OK 90 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 OK 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-cline-okla-2014.