Burnett v. State

83 S.W.3d 417, 350 Ark. 2, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 425
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 5, 2002
DocketCR 02-336
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 S.W.3d 417 (Burnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. State, 83 S.W.3d 417, 350 Ark. 2, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 425 (Ark. 2002).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Ross Burnett, through his attorney, G. B. “Bing” Colvin, has filed a motion for permissipn to file a belated brief. Pursuant to a granted motion for extension of time, Burnett’s brief was due on or before July 14, 2002. Mr. Colvin acknowledges that on August 8, 2002, he received the State’s motion to dismiss due to his failure to file the brief, but did not file his motion for belated brief until August 21, 2002.1 Mr. Colvin has accepted fault for the untimely tendering of the brief and asks the court to grant him extra time in which to file the brief.

We grant Burnett’s motion with the brief due on or before twenty-one days from the date of this order. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Boyette
207 S.W.3d 488 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Burnett v. State
86 S.W.3d 930 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.W.3d 417, 350 Ark. 2, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-state-ark-2002.